{"id":1284,"date":"2024-06-12T22:56:21","date_gmt":"2024-06-12T19:56:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/?p=1284"},"modified":"2026-04-08T18:18:03","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T15:18:03","slug":"human-intelligence-simulation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/human-intelligence-simulation\/","title":{"rendered":"Imitation of intellect\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Imitation of intellect\u2026<\/h2>\n

Methodological Annotation:<\/strong> This material examines the phenomenon of “statistical mimicry” in large language models (LLMs). It analyzes the structural gap between processing syntactic constructions and generating genuine semantic nodes within the framework of the theory of functional systems.<\/p>\n

\n

I watched a broadcast, read the comments\u2026 And I was surprised at how few questions people had!!! After all, Oleg Khomyak provided a bunch of important points! I would call this broadcast:\u00a0Epochal!<\/strong>\u00a0True, if you think about it!)))<\/p>\n

For example, the question:\u00a0“So what is thinking?”<\/strong><\/p>\n

Of course, the talk was about intellectuals, abstractions, concepts, and working with them\u2026<\/p>\n

But what if we look more broadly?<\/p>\n

For example, is there thinking in art? Does a composer, creating music, think?<\/p>\n

Or an engineer, creating a mechanism (a structure), does he think?<\/p>\n

And as one of the elements, Oleg proposed to use:\u00a0the embodiment of a thought (abstraction) into life.<\/strong><\/p>\n

So take the everyday level, if you are not a plumber, fixing a toilet tank? Is it necessary to understand the mechanism and fix it? Is there thinking here?<\/p>\n

So where does\u00a0“mulling over”<\/strong>\u00a0end and\u00a0“thinking”<\/strong>\u00a0begin?<\/p>\n

And the argument that a person, within a certain picture of the world and type of thinking, thinks, makes decisions, and acts the same way? And in fact, the work of a psychoanalyst is to change the picture of the world, the way of\u00a0“thinking” (mulling over)<\/strong>\u00a0, and start acting differently?<\/p>\n

Okay, so, what is\u00a0Karma<\/strong>\u00a0from this point of view? The production of the same actions with an identical result? And what does\u00a0“Correcting Karma”<\/strong>\u00a0mean? Eliminating erroneous elements of actions (initially elements of thinking) that lead to negative consequences?<\/p>\n

Alright\u2026 What about\u00a0destiny<\/strong>? When you correct Karma (the way of thinking and acting), are you essentially changing the\u00a0“direction of Destiny”<\/strong>\u00a0?<\/p>\n

So, to what extent is Destiny given to us from above? It’s clear that we don’t choose our parents (the genetic component, elements of upbringing, what situations we find ourselves in and gain experience and knowledge). But then what? Are we capable of changing, changing our picture of the world and thinking, making\u00a0“different decisions,”<\/strong>\u00a0and acting, and having different consequences? That is, are we capable of\u00a0“changing the direction of our own Destiny”?<\/strong>\u00a0Within what limits?<\/p>\n

But then,\u00a0“changing the direction of Destiny”<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 this is simply a\u00a0“technology”<\/strong>\u00a0for changing the\u00a0“Picture of the World”<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0“thinking”<\/strong>\u00a0! And psychoanalysts \u2013\u00a0“change the direction of a person’s personal destiny”<\/strong>\u00a0, an almost divine task and responsibility? And the influence of philosophers? Or other people who produce\u00a0“Pictures of the World”<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0“thinking”<\/strong>\u00a0?<\/p>\n

And how does this relate to\u00a0“Society”<\/strong>\u00a0? What is the\u00a0“Destiny of a People”<\/strong>\u00a0? And within what limits are\u00a0“changes in the direction of Destiny”<\/strong>\u00a0possible?<\/p>\n

Just an insane number of questions\u2026.<\/p>\n

https:\/\/youtu.be\/Wc1iWWRkaj0<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/p>\n

Conducting a semantic assembly in the Lamed Group field. Beginning level analysis of the article “Imitation of intellect\u2026”.<\/strong><\/p>\n

1. Facts (Raw Material)<\/strong>
\nThe article is a reflective commentary triggered by Oleg Khomyak’s broadcast. The text doesn’t so much give answers as it poses questions, expanding the concept of “thinking” far beyond intellectual activity. The key themes are:<\/p>\n