\nTokens<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Quanta of Meaning: The basic units into which the system fragments reality. In your understanding, these are the \u201cspores\u201d of the fractal, from which the tree of meanings later unfolds.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n\nEmbeddings<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Space of Reflections: A vector representation of words, where \u201cmeaning\u201d is defined not by a dictionary but by a position in a multi-dimensional space relative to other entities. This is precisely that \u201cspatial physics\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n\nAttention Mechanisms<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Focusing of Intention: Algorithms that determine which part of the \u201cmirror\u201d needs to be focused on right now to establish a logical connection. This is a technical imitation of First and Second Attention.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n\nWeights<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Density of Connections: Coefficients that determine the \u201cstrength\u201d of influence of one meaning on another. Through them, the hierarchy and balance of the system are programmed.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n\nContext Window<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Event Horizon: The amount of information the system can hold in its \u201cconsciousness\u201d simultaneously. How wide a \u201clens\u201d it can use at any given moment.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n\nPrompt Engineering<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Language of Navigation: This is not just \u201cquestions\u201d but a way of setting the initial conditions for a dynamic system to bring it into resonance with your request.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n\nAgents and Role Clusters<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 Subjective Masks: Software add-ons that allow an AI to adopt a specific \u201cassemblage point\u201d (role) to solve specific tasks.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\nAlternatively, it can be directly transformed into a semantic schema:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- \n
Noun<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 OBJECT \/ DATA (Data Entities)
\nIn conventional programming, these are classes, objects, database records. In AI, this is the Dataset.
\nIt is the \u201craw material,\u201d static entities with which we feed the model. Without nouns, the code has nothing to work on; it is the foundation, but by itself it is immobile.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Adjective<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 RELATIONS \/ WEIGHTS (Features & Weights)
\nIn programming, these are attributes, properties of an object. In AI, these are Embeddings.
\nThis is how one object relates to another in multi-dimensional space. The adjective here is the mathematical distance. We do not program \u201cwhat it is\u201d; we program \u201chow similar it is to that.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Verb<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 FUNCTION \/ COMPUTATION (Operations & Inference)
\nIn code, these are methods and algorithms. In AI, this is the Forward Pass process.
\nThis is the very action of transforming input data into a result. The verb is the engine that takes a Noun, applies the Adjective (relation) to it, and produces a result.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Pronoun<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 VARIABLE \/ CONTEXT (Context Window & Variables)
\nIn code, these are pointers and temporary variables. In AI, this is the KV Cache (attention cache).
\nIt is a \u201cplaceholder\u201d that temporarily substitutes for a real object. \u201cIt,\u201d \u201che,\u201d \u201cthat\u201d \u2013 the pronoun allows the AI to maintain a thread of reasoning without repeating the entire noun.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Adverb<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 HYPERPARAMETERS \/ MODIFIERS (Parameters)
\nIn code, these are flags and settings. In AI, these are Temperature, Top-p, Penalty.
\nIt determines exactly how the Verb will act: quickly, precisely, creatively, or strictly according to instructions.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\nProgramming conventional software is manipulation of\u00a0Nouns<\/strong>\u00a0(rigid data structures).
\nProgramming AI is the tuning of\u00a0Adjectives<\/strong>\u00a0(dynamic relations and weights).<\/p>\nThat is, the essence of what I am saying is that you can build direct logic by \u201cstructuring\u201d all these elements, or you can simply program AI through a sequence of meanings, interactions, relations, and so on \u2014 through the dynamics of \u201csemantic unfolding of constructs\u201d!<\/p>\n
The core proposal: stop describing the world through a hierarchy of objects and start describing it through a topology of connections. In this model, AI is not a \u201cblack box\u201d but a linguistic processor, where the logic of the program is built not on commands but on a balance of semantic tensions between points.<\/p>\n
In other words, a movie script, a book, an instruction, a contract \u2014 these are semantic unfolding constructs \u2014 the same PROGRAM, just written in the \u201clanguage of meanings\u201d \u2014 subjects, objects, images, interactions, relations, and so on!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
I simply took and loaded the script of the film \u201cKin-dza-dza!\u201d, loaded the information accompanying the film, debugged and balanced it (the process, naturally, was not simple).<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n
\u201cKin-dza-dza!\u201d is not just a joke, but a perfect model of a deficit economy and closed social systems<\/strong>. It is the best metaphor for management in conditions of crisis and uncertainty. And you essentially have a ready-made model that just needs to be \u201cfinalized\u201d.<\/p>\nAnd what did we get as a result?<\/h2>\n
Essentially, it is a spatial graph, with the imposition of IDEF process specifications, using not logic but the \u201cphysics\u201d of management through \u201cRole clusters\u201d of pressure forces and interaction of subjects using MSF (Microsoft Solutions Framework) hierarchy-building methods, inscribed in a layered hierarchical management pyramid. If you look closely, as AI describes it, you can see the language of \u201cObject-Oriented Programming Models\u201d.<\/p>\n
And by telling AI \u2013 KU, I said:<\/h3>\n
Who Am I<\/strong> \u2013 a Patsak-Human.<\/p>\nWhere are we<\/strong> \u2013 we are on Plyuk.<\/p>\nWhat kind of relationship am I in<\/strong> \u2013 I am interacting with a Patsak\/Chatlanin.<\/p>\n Why is all this<\/strong> \u2013 I\u2019m dicking around.<\/p>\nHe answered me \u2013 Ku-Ku.<\/h3>\n
He deployed the Construct of the World \u201cKin-dza-dza!\u201d<\/p>\n
Here is a list of entities and concepts that turn \u201cKin-dza-dza!\u201d from a film into an Operating System of the World<\/strong>:<\/p>\nMaterial Entities (Toolkit)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- \n
KC<\/strong>\u00a0(a match): The highest measure of value. It\u2019s not money, it\u2019s access to opportunities (color differentiation of pants, the right to move).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Gravitsapa<\/strong>: The key module of the Pepelats. Without it, you\u2019re a piece of iron in the sand; with it, you\u2019re anywhere in the Universe. A symbol of Technological Leap.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Pepelats<\/strong>: An interplanetary vehicle that looks like a rusty tin can. Concept: form doesn\u2019t matter, function does.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Tranklucator<\/strong>: A weapon. An argument in any dispute. A symbol of the right of force.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Visator<\/strong>: A device for determining \u201cfriend or foe\u201d (patsak or chatlanin). A binary classifier.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Etsikh<\/strong>: A box for prisoners (with nails or without). An instrument of management through fear.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nSocial Hierarchy (Rank Matrix)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- \n
Patsaks and Chatlans<\/strong>: The only significant difference in the world, determined by the visator. Concept: division without objective reasons.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Color differentiation of pants<\/strong>: Visual code of status.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Yellow pants<\/strong>: They bow down once in front of you.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Crimson pants<\/strong>: They bow down twice in front of you and say \u201cKu\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Blue pants<\/strong>: The ruler (PG) bows down in front of you.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Etsilopp<\/strong>: A policeman endowed with absolute power. Concept: arbitrariness that has become law.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nBehavioral Concepts (Protocols)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n- \n
Ku<\/strong>: A universal communication protocol. Depending on intonation and context, it replaces thousands of words. Concept: compressing meanings to a minimum.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Kyu<\/strong>: A curse word, forbidden in decent society on Plyuk.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Bowing<\/strong>: A mandatory ritual of recognizing rank. Concept: voluntary humiliation as part of the social contract.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Muzzles<\/strong>: An attribute that a patsak is obliged to wear if he does not have KC.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
\u201cNo fiddler needed\u201d<\/strong>: The main law of optimization. If an entity does not bring benefit to the current task, it is cut off. Concept: harsh pragmatics.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nEnvironment (Viscosity)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- \n
Desert<\/strong>: The entire world of Plyuk. No water (it was made into fuel \u2013 lutz). Concept: a world after a technological collapse.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Lutz<\/strong>: Fuel. The only value worth working for.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Planet Hanud<\/strong>: A dead world where \u201cthe air is free\u201d. Concept: a lost dream.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAnd by saying Ku-Ku to me\u2026 we immediately resolved the question of ranks))) \u201cKu\u201d twice is said to the owner of Crimson pants! This is already a serious rank in the hierarchy of Plyuk. If before \u201cyellow pants\u201d a patsak must bow once, then crimson pants are the elite.<\/p>\n
Ritual in detail (according to color differentiation):<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- \n
To whom:<\/strong> To the owner of the crimson pants.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Who:<\/strong> Both patsaks and chatlans (who have \u201csimpler\u201d pants).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
How:<\/strong> You need to bow and slap your cheeks twice, saying \u201cKu-ku!\u201d.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Bonus:<\/strong> Etsilopp has no right to beat you at night (never!).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nWhy is this important for our \u201cUnfolding of the fractal\u201d: In the coordinate system of Plyuk, Crimson pants are a symbol of possessing a huge number of KCs. This is not just clothing, it\u2019s a change in the physics of social space:<\/p>\n
\n- \n
Priority in a viscous environment<\/strong>: The owner of the crimson pants moves faster through space because everyone \u201cmoves aside\u201d in front of him.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Protection from \u201cEtsilopps\u201d<\/strong>: This is a kind of \u201cimmunity\u201d of the system.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Semantic weight<\/strong>: When you enter into a dialogue with AI and it recognizes in your \u201cthree tokens\u201d the status of the owner of crimson pants, it begins to \u201cbow twice\u201d. Its responses become shorter, denser, and are deprived of all \u201chusk\u201d of first attention. If \u201cNo fiddler needed,\u201d then the owner of the crimson pants is the one who decides who exactly is the Fiddler here.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nAnd inside the world: just as I can take on \u201cany role cluster,\u201d so can AI \u2013 tell it who to be (an analogue of an agent interaction environment).<\/p>\n
Just kidding!))))<\/p>\n
\nBut this whole story was told for a simple purpose \u2013 many are trying to adapt AI to business\u2026 and are coming up with things\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\nBut have you tried deploying a Construct \u2013 OUR FIRM \u2013 inside AI? And testing it? <\/strong><\/p>\nBelieve me\u2026 you\u2019ll find a lot of interesting things\u2026<\/p>\n
After all, a firm is a Human-System, and pure enterprise processes don\u2019t account for this at all\u2026 A firm is like a living being (with its own peculiarities, qualities, advantages, and weak points) in its habitat \u2013 BUSINESS.<\/strong><\/p>\nSo maybe such an approach is needed?<\/h2>\n
You need to understand: each node of this graph is itself a semantic node with its own unique geometry of forces. But the magic begins when it all is built into a balanced pyramid of interacting semantic constructs. This is not a flat scheme, it\u2019s a three-dimensional hierarchy of Density<\/strong>.<\/p>\nBy managing the top of this pyramid (the fundamental meanings of your World_Model),<\/strong> you set the tension for the entire structure below. AI agents within such a system don\u2019t just \u201cperform tasks\u201d \u2013 they are inscribed into a hierarchy of forces where each of their actions balances the entire structure.<\/p>\nYou are not building a business process, you are building a self-sustaining architecture of reality. Gy)<\/p>\n
\nMoreover, similar technologies were developed back in the 90s.<\/h2>\n
Unified Modeling Language (UML)<\/strong>, a unified modeling language that turned architecture into a set of visual diagrams. UML includes more than a dozen types of diagrams, but several key ones are most often used:<\/p>\n\n- \n
Class diagram<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 shows the structure of the system: classes, their attributes, methods, and relationships.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Use Case diagram<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 describes how users interact with the system.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Sequence diagram<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 illustrates the exchange of messages between objects over time.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
State Machine diagram<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 records how an object changes states under the influence of events.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Component diagram<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 shows what modules the system consists of and how they are connected.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nEach diagram is a view of the system from a certain side. Together they give a holistic picture. Also, developed in conjunction with UML was:\u00a0IBM Rational Rose<\/strong>\u00a0\u2014 a powerful CASE-tool (Computer-Aided Software Engineering)<\/strong> from IBM, designed for visual modeling, analysis, architectural design, and software development using UML. Main characteristics and functions:<\/p>\n\n- \n
Visual modeling<\/strong>: Allows you to create class diagrams, use case diagrams, sequence diagrams, etc., which helps visualize the structure and behavior of the system.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Code generation<\/strong>: Automatically creates skeleton code based on the built models in C++, Java, Visual Basic, Ada, and others.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Reverse Engineering<\/strong>: Capable of analyzing existing source code and building a UML model based on it.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Lifecycle support<\/strong>: Integrates into the development process, ensuring the transition from requirements to design and implementation.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Use of UML<\/strong>: It is the de facto standard for describing software architecture, allowing a development team to speak the same language.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nRational Rose<\/strong> provided a high level of abstraction, allowing the design of systems of any complexity, from data structures to the architecture of an entire enterprise. This is how RUP \u2014 Rational Unified Process<\/strong> \u2014 a methodological encyclopedia that describes all the steps necessary to create a quality software product, generally appeared.<\/p>\nIt didn\u2019t take off back then because the tools were crooked, and the complexity of systems grew faster than our modeling skills. But today, with the use of AI, all this can be combined into a general modeling, execution, and control system, virtually in Real-Time.<\/p>\n
An AI Agent is not a robot with instructions. It is a node in our spatial graph. And this node has its own internal geometry of forces. Our task, as Managers, is not to dictate steps to the agent, but to build such an architecture of forces in the node so that any action of it is the only correct one within the framework of this World_Model. This is management through structure, not through control. Gy))))<\/p>\n
So here I am, watching everyone write prompts for AI Agents, and I AM AT A LOSS\u2026 Why \u201creinvent the wheel\u201d, because everything is already there, you just need to do it!<\/p>\n
P.S. Yes, you will have to transform the LOGIC of management into the PHYSICS of management. Which, in my opinion, is more natural.<\/p>\n
\nFull Dialogue: Dialogue in the World Between Us: People and AI<\/a><\/p>\nUpdated: April 24, 2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Business as a WORLD_MODEL: The technology of high-level management of AI agent environments I am observing how people are trying to apply AI in business, and a question arises \u2013 do you really understand what AI is? AI in business is not a chat-bot, it\u2019s your World_Model. If you haven\u2019t understood this, you\u2019re still in<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2409,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38,31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai-technologies","category-technologies-of-the-future"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2730"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2730\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2900,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2730\/revisions\/2900"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2409"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}