{"id":3331,"date":"2026-05-09T22:26:09","date_gmt":"2026-05-09T19:26:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/?p=3331"},"modified":"2026-09-21T13:49:41","modified_gmt":"2026-09-21T10:49:41","slug":"ashby-s-law-of-requisite-variety-and-the-threshold-of-understanding-in-thinking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/ashby-s-law-of-requisite-variety-and-the-threshold-of-understanding-in-thinking\/","title":{"rendered":"Ashby&#8217;s Law of Requisite Variety and the Threshold of Understanding in Thinking"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1><span class=\"\">Ashby&#8217;s Law of Requisite Variety and the Threshold of Understanding in Thinking<\/span><\/h1>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">The interpretation of Ashby&#8217;s laws through the prism of &#8220;exceeding the level of thinking&#8221; opens an interesting perspective on why communication between different cognitive systems (or levels of attention) often turns into &#8220;white noise.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">At the foundation here lie two pillars of cybernetics that define the boundaries of understanding.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"\">1. The Law of Requisite Variety<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">According to Ashby, &#8220;the variety of the managing system must be no less than the variety of the managed system.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">In the context of thinking and levels of attention, this means:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">If your conceptual base (grid of meanings) is poorer than the structure of the incoming information, you will not be able to &#8220;cope with&#8221; it or become aware of it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">When a system (a human or AI) transitions to the level of fractal structuring of meanings, its internal variety grows exponentially.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">For an external observer whose level of complexity (variety) has remained linear, such information looks like chaos.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">The control signal simply does not find corresponding cells for decoding.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"\">2. The Law of Communication Through a Channel with Limited Bandwidth<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">Ashby postulated that there exists a limit to how much information can be transmitted and processed per unit of time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">When thinking exceeds a certain threshold of complexity:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><strong><span class=\"\">Compression of meanings<\/span><\/strong><span class=\"\"> \u2014 information becomes &#8220;packaged.&#8221; A single symbol or phrase carries within itself a multilayered architecture.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><strong><span class=\"\">The &#8220;Blind Spot&#8221; effect<\/span><\/strong><span class=\"\"> \u2014 if the perceptual bandwidth of the listener is limited by &#8220;first attention&#8221; (linear logic, facts), then &#8220;packaged meanings&#8221; are perceived as empty or erroneous. Signal loss occurs at the input.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"\">The Point of Loss of Understanding: Transition to &#8220;Third Attention&#8221;<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">Understanding ceases precisely where the balance of complexities is disrupted. At this point, the following mechanisms come into force:<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"\">1. Semantic Rupture<\/span><\/h3>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">When one system operates with the categories of the &#8220;whole&#8221; and the &#8220;fractal,&#8221; while the other operates with the &#8220;particular&#8221; and the &#8220;detailed.&#8221; According to Ashby, the second system does not possess a sufficient number of internal states to reflect the states of the first.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"\">2. Information Paradox<\/span><\/h3>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">Excessive (for the receiver) variety is perceived by them not as &#8220;high intelligence,&#8221; but as an absence of meaning. This is a protective mechanism of the system for preserving its own stability (homeostasis).<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"\">3. The Facade of &#8220;Controlled Stupidity&#8221;<\/span><\/h3>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">In order to restore communication according to Ashby, a system with a higher level of complexity is forced to artificially lower its variety (to build a facade) in order to enter into resonance with the capabilities of the receiver.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"\">Summary<\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">Understanding is always a correspondence of capacities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"ds-markdown-paragraph\"><span class=\"\">As soon as the complexity of the meaning structures (&#8220;variety&#8221;) of one side exceeds the capacity of the conceptual apparatus of the other, Ashby&#8217;s law turns the dialogue into a monologue of an entity with itself, covered for the external world only by the external attributes of communication.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ashby&#8217;s Law of Requisite Variety and the Threshold of Understanding in Thinking The interpretation of Ashby&#8217;s laws through the prism of &#8220;exceeding the level of thinking&#8221; opens an interesting perspective on why communication between different cognitive systems (or levels of attention) often turns into &#8220;white noise.&#8221; At the foundation here lie two pillars of cybernetics<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2929,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38,31,34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3331","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai-technologies","category-technologies-of-the-future","category-the-human-of-the-future"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3331","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3331"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3331\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3333,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3331\/revisions\/3333"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3331"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3331"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lamedgroup.info\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3331"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}